Anand Satishkumar Surana v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3262 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 5236 OF 2010 Anand Satishkumar Surana ..Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra through Police Inspector, CIDCO Police Station, Aurangabad and anr.

..Respondents Mr P.B. Shirsath, Advocate for applicant Mr V.M. Kagne, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND A.M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 30th June 2017 PER COURT Heard.

2.

Having regard to the contents of the application, it would be expedient to allow the same and stands granted in terms of prayer clause (B). Amendment be carried out immediately. The applicant to supply copy of the amended application by Monday to respondents. 3.

Till next date, there shall be ad interim relief in terms of prayer clause (C).

4.

It is expected that the matter would be finally argued on the next date.

5.

Criminal Application No.5236 of 2010 be listed for hearing on 12th July 2017. In the meanwhile, respondent No.2 to file affidavit-inreply and supply copy of the same to other side. ( A.M. DHAVALE, J.) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.) vvr