← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1229/2024disposed off

Gunwantrao Harbaji Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025-09-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan2 pages

(1) 905 Cri.WP-1229.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1229 OF 2024 GUNWANTRAO HARBAJI PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. K.P. Rodge, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. A.V. Lavate, A.P.P. for respondent-State. Ms. A.S. Jadhav, Advocate for respondent No.2. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND MEHROZ K. PATHAN, JJ.

DATED :

9 SEPTEMBER 2025 Per Court :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

By way of this petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of F.I.R. in Crime No. 38/2022 dated 24.02.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 464, 465, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered with Udgir City Police Station. However, during pendency of this petition, compromise has taken place between the petitioner and respondent No.2 i.e. the original complainant. As such, now the petitioner is seeking quashing of F.I.R. on compromise. 3.

The petitioner as well as respondent No.2 have filed joint compromise purshis on record mentioning that due to intervention of the elder people, they have settled dispute

(2) 905 Cri.WP-1229.2024.odt between themselves Learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court has also submitted report mentioning that the parties, after admitting the contents of joint purshis, voluntarily signed the same. Further, it appears that a private complaint bearing R.C.C. No.58/2022 lodged by respondent No.2 before J.M.F.C. Udgir, based on which the aforesaid F.I.R. is lodged, has also been disposed of in view of the aforesaid compromise. In view of the same, the present petition is allowed and the F.I.R. in Crime No. 38/2022 registered with Udgir City Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 464, 465, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, stands quashed and set aside to the extent of the present petitioner. (MEHROZ K. PATHAN) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde