← Library
Bombay High CourtREVN/167/2003rule absolute

Laxman Kacharu Mote v. State Of Maha And ORS

2015-03-27Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Sadhana S. Jadhav2 pages

(1) Cri. Revn. Appln. No. 167 of 2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Revision Application No. 167 of 2003 Laxman Kacharu Mote, Age : 36 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Khiratpur, .. Revision Applicant Taluka : Vaijapur, (Original opponent / District : Aurangabad.

Husband) versus

1. The State of Maharashtra.

2. Deepjyoti Laxman Mote, Age : Minor, u/g. of Ashwini Laxman Mote, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Nagina Pimpalgaon, Taluka : Vaijapur, District : Aurangabad.

3. Rani Laxman Mote, Age : Minor, u/g. of Ashwini Laxman Mote, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Household, R/o. Nagina Pimpalgaon, Taluka : Vaijapur, District : Aurangabad.

.. Respondents.

.........................

Mr. S.G. Bhalchandra, Advocate, for the revision applicant (Absent).

Mr. S.G. Nandedkar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.1 - State.

(2) Cri. Revn. Appln. No. 167 of 2003 Mr. A.S. Shelke, Advocate, for respondent nos.2 and 3. ..........................

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATE : 27TH MARCH 2015 PER COURT :

1.

None present for the revision applicant when the matter is called out. Heard the learned APP Mr. S.G. Nandedkar for respondent no.1 - State and Adv. Mr. A.S. Shelke for respondent nos.2 and 3. 2.

It appears from the record, that the revision applicant has challenged the order in execution petition wherein he was to pay the entire amount of Rs. 18,000/- towards maintenance to respondent no.2. By passage of time, since no stay was granted, the order of execution must have been implemented.

3.

In view of this, the Revision Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule is discharged.

( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV ) JUDGE ................................

puranik / CRIREVN167.03