Bhagubai Junglu Shinde And Another v. Ramesh Kitkul Gajare

( 1 ) 914 CRA 99 of 2016 & anr.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2016 WITH CRA/100/2016 BHAGUBAI JUNGLU SHINDE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

RAMESH KITKUL GAJARE ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Patil Vijay Y.(absent) Advocate for Respondents : Mr.V.B. Patil ...

CORAM : M.S.SONAK, J.

DATE :

9.1.2018 PER COURT:- 1) None appears for the applicants.

2) Mr.V.B.Patil learned Advocate for the respondents points out that on last occasion itself, the Advocate for the applicants had made a statement that applicant No.1, Bhagubai Junglu Shinde has expired. He points out that Bhagubai Junglu Shinde has expired almost 4 to 6 months ago. Till date, no steps are taken.

( 2 ) 914 CRA 99 of 2016 & anr.

3) Further, today, when the matter is called out, neither applicant No.2 nor his Advocates are present. Therefore, in the said circumstances, these Civil Revision Applications are dismissed for non-prosecution. 4) The record indicates that the applicants have not even furnished any document of deposit of the costs of Rs.500/- till today.

[M.S.SONAK, J.] SPT/914 CRA 99 of 2016 & anr.