Ramesh Bhimrao Lamjane v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Collector, Osmanabad And ORS
2024:BHC-AUG:21213 ( 1 ) [ca9494.24]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1039 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9494 OF 2024 IN FA/426/2022 LAHU SHIVAJI LAMJANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9492 OF 2024 IN FA/427/2022 BABRUWAN KUNDALIK MANE (DIED) THR LRS JANABAI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS 1046 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9508 OF 2024 IN FAST/22798/2020 KASHINATH RAYAPPA BIRAJDAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. 1044 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9502 OF 2024 IN FA/3015/2021 KANTABAI LAXMAN MULE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9503 OF 2024 IN FA/3014/2021 ANAPURNABAI MAHADEV ZURALE (DIED) THR LRS SIDDHAPA ZURALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS 1045 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9507 OF 2024 IN FA/401/2022 RAMESH BHIMRAO LAMJANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9506 OF 2024 IN FA/402/2022 MADHUKAR MARUTI MATOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9505 OF 2024 IN FA/399/2022
( 2 ) [ca9494.24] KASHINATH RAYAPPA BIRAJDAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9504 OF 2024 IN FA/400/2022 SUDHAKAR MARUTI MATOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS Mr.A.B. Kale, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr.V.S. Badakh, Mr. P.D. Patil, Ms. R.R. Tandale, AGPs for the respondent-State. Mr. A.S. Shelke, Mr. S.G. Bhalerao and Mr.R.A. Tambe, Advocate for respondent No./acquiring body in the respective matters.
CORAM
: KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 05.09.2024 PC :- 01.
Heard. These applications are filed for withdrawal of the amount. Learned Advocate Mr. Tambe for respondent No.3. vehemently opposes the application. 02.
This Court while granting stay had directed to deposit 75% of the amount granted by the Reference Court. Considering that the property acquired is house property and the amounts are very meager i.e. about Rs.1 lakh, this Court is inclined to allow the applications.
(i) The applications are allowed.
(ii) The applicants are permitted to withdraw entire amount deposited by appellant/acquiring body in this Court along with accrued interest on furnishing usual undertaking.
[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2024/sep24/ca9494.24