Prabhakar Ganpati Thorat v. The Additional Collector And Arbitrator And Others
15to21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 15 WRIT PETITION NO.8321 OF 2022 SUSHILABAI MAHADU SHINDE
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS AND 16 WRIT PETITION NO.8322 OF 2022 SUSHILABAI MAHADU SHINDE
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS AND 17 WRIT PETITION NO.8323 OF 2022 SHASHIKALA UTTAM SHINDE
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS AND 18 WRIT PETITION NO.8325 OF 2022 PRABHAKAR GANPATI THORAT
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS AND 19 WRIT PETITION NO.8327 OF 2022 SANJAY UTTAMRAO SHINDE
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS AND 20 WRIT PETITION NO.8344 OF 2022 PANDHARINATH RAJU BANSODE
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS AND 21 WRIT PETITION NO.8347 OF 2022 SANJAY UTTAM SHINDE
VERSUS
THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND ARBITRATOR AND OTHERS ...
Mr. Vikram S. Undre, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for the respondents-State Mr. S.S. Deve, Advocate for respondent No.3
15to21
CORAM
:S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING C. J. & GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2023 ORDER:
1.
We have heard Mr. Undre, the learned counsel for the petitioners. The learned counsel submits that award has been passed in favour of the petitioners. The National Highway Authority has filed an application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act challenging the arbitration award. The learned counsel submits that the National Highway Authority be directed to deposit the amounts. Mr. Deve, the learned counsel is appearing for respondent No.3. 2.
The petitioners have not filed execution proceedings as yet. The petitioners may file execution proceedings as permissible under the provisions of the Act. In the execution proceedings, if after reasonable time also, no orders are passed, then the petitioners may approach this Court. The petitioners are also at liberty to file such application in the pending application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act as permissible in law. With this observation, the writ petitions are disposed of.
(GAURI GODSE, J) ( ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) JPChavan