Yogeshwar Babuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 943 CONT. PETITION NO. 5 OF 2014 IN WP/9818/2012 Kai. Tulsa Aai Bahuudeshiya Mahila Mandal, Chopda

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Irpatgire h.f Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. K. Shirse ...

AND 944 CONT. PETITION NO. 6 OF 2014 IN WP/9233/2010 Yogeshwar Babuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Another ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Irpatgire h.f Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. D.R . Korde ...

AND 945 CONT. PETITION NO. 9 OF 2014 IN WP/9238/2010 Yogeshwar Babuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Irpatgire h.f Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. G. Joshi ...

AND 946 CONT. PETITION NO. 10 OF 2014 IN WP/8539/2012 Konark Sevabhavi Sanstha, Hingoli

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. N. Irpatgire h.f Mr. Rudrawar S.G. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. K. Shirse ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : November 28, 2025.

Page 1 of

943 CP 5-2014 PER COURT :- 1.

The learned Counsel, Mr. A. N. Irpatgire, holding for Mr. S. G. Rudrawar for the petitioner, submits that, due to the considerable passage of time, the inquiry contemplated under the Act would be difficult. He contends that, in such circumstances, nothing would survive in the petition. 2.

In view of the above submission, the contempt petitions stand dismissed.

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.

Page 2 of