Tanaji Venkatrao Ulgulwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

925 n 955 wp.9003.21 anr.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

925 WRIT PETITION NO.9003 OF 2021 TANAJI VENKATRAO ULGULWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ghanshyam K. Chinchole. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Tiwari.

...

AND 955 WRIT PETITION NO.9018 OF 2021 SHASHIKALA GANGADHAR MAMILWAD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ghanshyam K. Chinchole. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. G. Karlekar. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE :

18th August, 2021.

P.C.:

1.

The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent - State. 2.

It is submitted that, validation proceedings in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioners are pending with the Scrutiny Committee, the same are not decided. Without issuing notice to the petitioners, the respondents have placed the petitioners on the supernumerary posts. 3.

As the impugned orders are passed without notice to the petitioners, we quash and set aside the impugned orders.

925 n 955 wp.9003.21 anr.odt 4.

In case the respondents want to take action against the petitioners placing the petitioners on supernumerary post or otherwise, then notice shall be issued to the petitioners, calling upon him to show cause. In that event, the petitioners can file reply and bring all the relevant facts to the notice of the respondent - Committee. 5.

The Committee shall decide the validation proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months. 6.

The petitioners shall appear before the Committee on 7th September, 2021, if the circumstances so permit. 7.

Writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] nga