Pravin Venkatrao Bhatane v. The State Of Maharashtra And Anothers

WP 7423.2015.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7423 OF 2015 PRAVIN VENKATRAO BHATANE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. J.M. Murkute AGP for Respondents: Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi ...

CORAM : S V GANGAPURWALA & V.K. JADHAV, JJ.

Dated: July 28, 2015 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

We have heard Mr. Murkute the learned counsel for the petitioner. Yesterday also we had asked the learned AGP to take instructions. It is the case of the petitioner that, by mistake the petitioner had filled in the form stating wrong reservation instead of applying from person with disability category, the petitioner wrongly mentioned reservation as hilly area. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner be allowed to compete. 2.

Learned AGP submits that petitioner is not eligible to seek admission to the M.B.B.S and B.D.S. course as the petitioner has not even secured 40% marks in MH-CET.

3.

Rule 4.9 of the examination brochure in MH-CET lays down that for a person to be eligible for admission to the MBBS and BDS course, he should have secured not less than 40% marks in PCB. The petitioner has secured only 65 marks out of 200 i.e. not even 33% marks.

WP 7423.2015.odt 4.

Considering the above, case of the petitioner cannot be considered. Writ Petition, as such, stands dismissed. No costs. ( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( S V GANGAPURWALA, J. ) ...

aaa/-