← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/2518/2021partly allowed and partly dismissed

Piratsingh Rajesingh Girase v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, And ORS

2023-04-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

1 7 to 9 & 71 fa 459-08+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 FIRST APPEAL NO.2515 OF 2021 SUVARNA KOMAL GIRASE

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellants : Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. D. D. Pokharkar ...

AND 8 FIRST APPEAL NO.2516 OF 2021 NARENDRA SUBHASH GIRASE

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellants : Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. S. Dande Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. D. D. Pokharkar ...

AND 9 FIRST APPEAL NO.2518 OF 2021 PIRATSINGH RAJESINGH GIRASE

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellants : Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. D. D. Pokharkar ...

AND 71 FIRST APPEAL NO.3738 OF 2019 WITH FA/2001/2020 WITH FA/3732/2019 WITH FA/1283/2022 WITH FA/1282/2022 WITH FA/713/2021 LALIT BHIMSING GIRASE

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MEDIUM

2 7 to 9 & 71 fa 459-08+ IRRIGATION, DHULE AND ORS ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 3: Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. A. D. Pawar & Ms. Manjusha S. Jagtap ....

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 03/04/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard for some time.

2.

The learned counsel Mr. Pawar submits that though there is a letter issued by the acquiring body for the readiness of settling the matters as per the decisions of Lok-Adalat dated 08/02/2023 in some of the matters, but the matters are to be heard on merits irrespective of direction of acquiring body to settle the matters considering the rate of 85% of the valuation of house structures. The letter dated 03/03/2023 issued by the acquiring body clearly indicates that the aforesaid rate must be followed and the concerned appeals be disposed of accordingly. 3.

As such, it appears that the learned counsel Mr. Pawar is submitting contrary to the letter of appellant - acquiring body. In view of the same, the concerned offcer i.e. Executive Engineer of the acquiring body is directed to remain present before this court on 12/04/2023.

4.

Stand over to 12/04/2023.

( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-