Sow Gunabai Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Through Its Secretary Vasant Rambhau Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 955 WRIT PETITION NO.9061 OF 2021 SOW. GUNABAI GRAMIN SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VASANT RAMBHAU RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. N. P. Jamalpurkar Patil AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. G. Karlekar ...
956 WRIT PETITION NO.9062 OF 2021 KANIFNATH GRAMIN VIKAS SANSTHA, PARALI VAIJNATH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY VASANT RAMBHAU RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. N. P. Jamalpurkar Patil AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. G. Karlekar ...
958 WRIT PETITION NO.9627 OF 2021 INDIRA MAHILA SEVA SOCIETY THROUGH ITS TRUSTEE SHUBHAM VIVEK PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. N. P. Jamalpurkar Patil AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. G. Karlekar ...
1071 WRIT PETITION NO.9569 OF 2021 VASANTRAO NAIK ASHRAM SHALA SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT DATTA SAKHARAM RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TROUGH PRINCIPAL ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. N. P. Jamalpurkar Patil AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. G. Karlekar
...
1072 WRIT PETITION NO.9570 OF 2021 SHIVSHANKAR SHIKSHAN SEVABAVI SANSTHA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT BABURAO DAMODHAR JADHAV
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TROUGH PRINCIPAL ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. N. P. Jamalpurkar Patil AGP for Respondents : Mr. S. G. Karlekar ...
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 03rd SEPTEMBER, 2021 PER COURT :
1.
The learned counsels for petitioners submit that the petitioners have filed applications for renewal for their registration / license with the respondent, but the same are not yet decided.
2.
The learned AGP appears for the respondents.
3.
In case the applications are filed by the petitioners for renewal of their license and if the same are pending before the authority, then the authority shall take decision upon it's own merits and in accordance with law and procedure, preferably within a period of three months.
4.
Till the decision is taken by the authority on the
applications of the petitioners for renewal of their license, the respondents shall not take any steps with regard to the inmates. Till then, the status quo be maintained as on today, with regard to the inmates present with the petitioners. However, no new inmates be allowed to the petitioners till the applications are decided.
5.
This protection is available to the petitioners till the applications are decided. Parties shall be governed by the orders that will be passed by the authority on the applications of the petitioners for renewal of their license.
6.
Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) SVH