← Library
Bombay High CourtEPAP/104/2025disposed off

Smt. Karuna Dhananjay Munde v. The Returning Officer And Others

2025-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 999 ELECTION PETITION NO. 7 OF 2025 SHRI. RAJABHAU SHRIRAM PHAD

VERSUS

SHRI. DHANANJAY PANDITRAO MUNDE AND OTHERS ...

WITH ELECTION PETITION NO. 10 OF 2025 WITH APPLICATION IN EP NO. 17 OF 2025 IN EP/7/2025 WITH APPLICATION IN EP NO. 42 OF 2025 IN EP/7/2025 WITH APPLICATION IN EP NO. 81 OF 2025 IN EP/7/2025 WITH APPLICATION IN EP NO. 106 OF 2025 IN EP/7/2025 WITH APPLICATION IN EP NO. 105 OF 2025 IN EP/7/2025 WITH APPLICATION IN EP NO. 104 OF 2025 IN EP/10/2025 ...

Advocate for the petitioner in EP No.7/2025 : Mr.S.B.Yawalkar & Mr.M.V.Nagargoje Advocate for respondent no.1 in EP No.7/2025 : Mr.M.S.Karad Advocate for respondent no.3 in EP No.7/2025 : Mr.R.B.Wankhede h/f. Mr.N.L.Jadhav ...

...

Advocate for the petitioner in EP No.10/2025 : Mr.C.V.Thombre Advocate for respondent no.1 in EP No.10/2025 : Mr.Alok Sharma Advocate for respondent no.2 in EP No.10/2025 : Mr.M.S.Karad ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 16.07.2025 P.C. :

Election Petition No.7/2025 :

1] The learned counsel for the election petitioner has filed his reply to the application below Exh.14 and the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-15. 2] This Court, by order dated 18th June, 2025, has already granted time to the respondent no.1 to file written statement. Today again, the respondent no.1 has filed application, seeking time to file written statement and the same is taken on record and marked Exhibit-16. 3] By way of last opportunity, three weeks time is granted to the respondent no.1 to file written statement. The respondent no.1 is put to notice that no further request for adjournment would be entertained.

Election Petition No.10/2025 :

1] The learned counsel for the election petitioner has filed an application seeking no w.s. order against the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 13 and the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-11. The learned counsel for the election petitioner submits that the respondent nos.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 13 are served through court service and also by paper publication, however, since last two months they have not filed appearance or say, as such, no written statement order be passed.

2] The learned counsel for respondent no.1 has filed application to permit the respondent no.1 to remove EVM from strong room and the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-13, so also, he has filed application to delete the respondent no.1 to the election petition and the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-14 , so also, he has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1 and the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-15. 3] The learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has filed an application seeking time to file written statement and the same is taken on record and marked as Exhibit-12.

By way of last opportunity, three weeks time is granted to the respondent no.2 to file written statement. 4] List the matter on 06.08.2025.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC