Mubarak Haroon Moman v. State Of Maha

1 Cr. Revn. Apln. 312.2003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 312 OF 2013 Mubarak s/o Haroon Meman .... APPLICANT V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra .... RESPONDENT .............................

Mr. V.C.Patil h/f Mr. S.M.Godsay, Advocate for applicant.

Mrs. Pratibha Bharad, A.P.P. for Resp.- State. ..............................

CORAM : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.

DATE : 5th AUGUST, 2015 .............................

PER COURT :

1.

Mr. V.C.Patil holding for Mr. S.M.Godsay, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in view of the statement made in the reply in Criminal Revision Application No. 20/2002 filed by the State before the learned revisional Court, present applicant has stated that he has already taken rotten jaggery on executing Suprudnama as per the order passed by learned Magistrate. He, therefore, submitted that present Criminal Revision Application becomes infructuous. Statement accepted.

2 Cr. Revn. Apln. 312.2003 2.

Present Criminal Revision Application is rendered as infructuous.

[V.M.DESHPANDE, J.] KNP/Cr. Revn. Apln. 312.2003