Shaikh Muhammad Jafar Qasim v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 8902.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8902 OF 2019 Sanjay Shankarrao Shingade and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Ashok R. Tapse, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri P. G. Borade, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri V. M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8917 OF 2019 Shaikh Muhammad Jafar Qasim .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Ashok R. Tapse, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri P. G. Borade, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri V. M. Chate, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 22ND JULY, 2019.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Heard.

2 wp 8902.19 2.

The grievance raised in the instant petitions is no more res- integra and is covered by the Judgment delivered by this Court on 16.12.2014 in Writ Petition No. 6116 of 2014 and other companion matters.

3.

For the reasons recorded while disposing of the aforesaid Writ Petitions, the instant Writ Petitions also deserve to be allowed and the same are hereby allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioners for grant of two increments, as per the policy of the Government and in consonance with the judgment referred to above, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today.

4.

The Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs. [MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/July 19