Shripad Vinayak Thombre And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

( 1 ) 42 wp 8501.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 42 WRIT PETITION NO.8501 OF 2019 SHRIPAD VINAYAK THOMBRE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S.S. Kazi AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.R. Kale ...

CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE :

15.07.2019 P.C. :- We have heard Mr. Kazi the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned A.G.P. The petitioner has an alternate remedy available. There would be disputed questions of fact. It would not be possible to go into the disputed questions of fact in the writ jurisdiction. Moreover, as the petitioner has an alternate remedy, we dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy. All contentions kept open. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] mub