← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10972/2016disposed off

Arun Maruti Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2021-09-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. G. Mehare3 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 WRIT PETITION NO.10909 OF 2016 KAILAS MOHAN PATIL AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr A. V. Hon, Advocate for petitioners;

Mr P. S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents/State AND WRIT PETITION NO.10972 OF 2016 ARUN MARUTI CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr A. G. Choudhari, Advocate for petitioner;

Mr P. S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents/State CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATE : 8th September, 2021 PER COURT:

1.

The learned Advocate Shri. Hon appearing for the petitioners in Writ Petition No.10909/2016, submits that petitioner No.4 - Nitin Gajanan Bhandari and petitioner No.5 - Sunil Mansaram Chaudhari, have informed him in writing that their names be deleted from the proceedings. Copy of the communication is taken on record and marked as 'X-1' for identification.

(2) 2.

In view of the above, the names of these two petitioners in Writ Petition No.10909/2016 stand deleted. Deletion be carried out forthwith.

3.

The learned A.G.P. places on record the judgment delivered by the learned Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan and others Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, 2019 (3) Mh.L.J. 903. He submits that the issue raised in these two petitions is squarely answered by the learned Full Bench concluding that pension and retiral benefits would be an entitlement to those retired employees, who were working in an institution which was receiving 100% grant-in-aid on the cut off date.

4.

The learned Advocate Shri. Hon, appearing for the petitioners in Writ Petition No.10909/2016, seeks time to study the judgment.

5.

List Writ Petition No.10909/2016 in the passing orders category on 20/09/2021.

(3) 6.

The learned Advocate Shri. Choudhari, appearing for the petitioner in Writ Petition No.10972/2016, submits that the judgment in Deshmukh Dilipkumar Bhagwan & others (supra) squarely applies to the case of the petitioner. He, therefore, prays for the disposal of the said petition.

7.

In view of the same, Writ Petition No.10972/2016, in the light of the learned Full Bench's decision, stands disposed off. (S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk