Babita Babasaheb Ghodke v. The Principal Secretary Department Of Home Mantralaya And Others

{1} drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.10156 OF 2018 Babita Babasaheb Ghodke PETITIONER

VERSUS

The Principal Secretary, in the Department of Home Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A. N. Irpatgire, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for respondent - State Mr. M. G. Deokate, Advocate for respondent No.3 .......

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1095 OF 2022 Waman ambadas More and Others APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Babita Babasaheb Ghodke and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Jayant R. Patil, Advocate for applicants (Intervenors) Mr. A. N. Irpatgire, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for respondent - State Mr. M. G. Deokate, Advocate for respondent No.4 .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 29 th MARCH, 2022

{2} ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the petitioner places on record written instructions received from the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

2.

Mr. Patil, learned advocate for the intervenors vehemently opposes withdrawal of the writ petition and prays that interim stay granted to the order impugned in the present petition may be continued. The intervenors are interested parties in the present matter as intervenor No.1 had moved resolution before Gram Sabha for closing down Radhika Sanskrutik Loknatya Kala Kendra, At Sindala (Lo), Taluka - Ausa, District - Latur, run by respondent No.3, which was passed. According to him, the closure of the said Kala Kendra is in the common interest of the residents of the village Sindala and adjoining villages. He, therefore, prays for continuation of the stay granted to the impugned order, for a period of four weeks, so as to enable the intervenors to challenge the order impugned in this writ petition. 3.

The relief cannot be granted to the intervenors in the petition filed by the petitioner, particularly when the petitioner is seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

4.

The petitioner is allowed to withdraw the writ petition. Writ

{3} petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Interim relief granted in favour of the petitioner is vacated.

5.

In view of disposal of the writ petition, civil application is also disposed of.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI] JUDGE drp/wp10156-18