Kachru Narayan Ingole v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS
1 908-12069-2018ca
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12069 OF 2018 IN FAST/21172/2018 GORAKHNATH KACHRU INGOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ..
909 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12070 OF 2018 IN FAST/21180/2018 RAMPRASAD DAJIBA SATHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ..
910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12071 OF 2018 IN FAST/21166/2018 VISHNU KISAN MUNDLIK
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12315 OF 2018 IN FAST/21178/2018 OMPRAKASH DAJIBA SATHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ...
913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12316 OF 2018 IN FAST/21170/2018 GORAKHNATH KACHRU INGOLE AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ..
914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.12319 OF 2018 IN FAST/21174/2018 KACHRU NARAYAN INGOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS ..
915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14130 OF 2018 IN FAST/21168/2018 HARIBHAU KACHRU INGOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
2 908-12069-2018ca 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.119 OF 2019 IN FAST/21184/2018 DAJIBA BHIMRAO SATHE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Mr D.M. Kanade, Advocate for applicants Mr P.M. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 and 2/State in C.A.No.12069/2018, C.A.No. 12319 OF 2018, C.A.No.119/2019 Ms P.V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 and 2/State in C.A.No.12070/2018, C.A.No.12315/2018 Mr P.V. Virdhe, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 and 2/State in C.A.No.12071/2018, C.A.No.12316/2018 and C.A.No.14130/2018 Mr S.C. Arora, Advocate for respondent no.3 CORAM : SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 15th DECEMBER, 2021 PER COURT :
1.
These are the applications for condonation of delay moved by the original claimants.
2.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.P.s for respondents no.1 and 2/State in respective applications and Mr S.C. Arora, learned Advocate for respondent no.3/acquiring body. 3.
In all these applications for condonation of delay, there is delay of more than 700 days in preferring the appeals. 4.
For the reasons stated in the applications for condonation of delay and considering the points involved in the appeals, delay needs to be condoned in all these civil applications moved by the respective claimants. However, the applicants/claimants shall not be entitled to get statutory benefits and interest for
3 908-12069-2018ca the delayed period. They need to file usual undertaking to that effect with the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
ORDER
(i) The Civil Applications for condonation of delay moved by the applicants are hereby allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) on condition that the applicant/claimants shall not claim statutory benefits and interest in respect of delayed period.
(ii) The applicants/claimants shall furnish undertaking to that effect with the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.
(iii) On furnishing such undertaking by the respective applicants/claimants, the Registry to make scrutiny of the appeals as per procedure and thereafter, those appeals be numbered and placed before the Court for admission.
(iv) The Civil Applications stand disposed of accordingly. ( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) vvr