Anuradha Vasantrao Kale v. Ravindra Balapure And Another
1 cp 493.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 493 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9686 OF 2015 Anuradha Vasantrao Kale .. Petitioner
Versus
Ravindra Balapure and another .. Respondents Shri Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2017.
PER COURT :
.
We have heard Mr. Salunke, the learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned Additional Government Pleader states that, the directions are issued to absorb the petitioner in another school. Mr. Salunke, the learned counsel submits that, though the orders of absorption are issued, the petitioner is not being absorbed by the institution. The learned counsel states that, further the arrears of salary are not paid to the petitioner. 2.
This Court under order April 4, 2016 had directed the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioner with
2 cp 493.16 regard to the arrears of salary and the outstanding amount. In the order dated 09.03.2017 filed along with affidavit of the respondents, it does not appear that the decision has been taken by the concerned authority about the entitlement of the petitioner about arrears of salary. In fact, the respondents were duty bound to decide the said aspect pursuant to the orders passed by this Court.
3.
Mrs. Gondhalekar, the learned Additional Government Pleader on instructions of Dr. Ravindra C. Balapure, Incharge Joint Director, Vocational Education and Training, Regional Office, Aurangabad, who is present in the Court states that, the decision about the entitlement of the petitioner about the arrears of salary would be taken within a period of one month. Said decision be taken after verifying the record and on its own merits.
4.
In case the decision is not favourable to the petitioner, the petitioner would be at liberty to take up appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law. Contempt petition is disposed of. No costs.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/April 17