Balaji Kashinath Reddy v. G Shrikant And Others

1 cp 452.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 452 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9746 OF 2016 Balaji Kashinath Reddy .. Petitioner

Versus

G. Shrikant and others .. Respondents Shri Pratap G. Rodge, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. G. Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent / State. Shri S. G. Rurdrawar, Advocate for Respondent No. 3. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 4 th December, 2017 PER COURT :

1.

The committee has come to the conclusion that the land claimed by the petitioner is not acquired and has directed the Talathi to cancel the Ferfar No. 639.

2.

After Ferfar No. 639 is cancelled the original position would stand restored. The committee had directed the enquiry to be conducted by the Tahsildar.

3.

The committee had come to the conclusion that the land is

2 cp 452.17 not acquired, then in such circumstances unless there is a contrary material on record the original entry needs to be restored.

4.

It is stated by Mr. Rudrawar, the learned advocate that mutation entry No. 639 has been cancelled.

5.

In view of that original entry stands restored. The authorities shall restore the original position on the 7/12 extract as it exist prior to Mutation Entry No. 639. The parties can take further steps as per the record.

6.

The contempt petition stands disposed of. No costs. [S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] marathe/Dec.17