Sarika Gautam Nikam v. Gautam Arjun Nikam

crirev416.03 (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 416 OF 2003 Sarika w/o Gautam Nikam, Age: 23 years, Occu: Household Residing at Harsool, Aurangabad ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

1.

Shri Gautam s/o Arjun Nikam, Age: 31 years, Occu: Rickshaw Driver, Residing Opp: Tata Power House, Pisovali, Jaibhimnagar, Kalyan(East), Mumbai 2.

State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENTS Mr Kshitij Surve, Advocate holding for Mr Hemant Surve, Advocate for applicant;

Mr A. R. Kale, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 2 CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 4th May, 2016 ORAL ORDER :

Having heard Mr Surve, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant for sometime, it is required to be noted that, in case if the fresh application for enhancement is preferred by the applicant, same be decided by the concerned Court, without being influenced of the observations made in the order dated 12th November, 2003, passed in rejected case No. 81 of 2003 by the learned Family Court, Aurangabad (Sarika w/o Gautam Nikam Vs. Shri Gautam s/o Arjun Nikam). 2.

With above observations, Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of.

(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) sjk