Mandakini Ramesh Raje v. The State Of Mah And ORS

G.A.Ghule 1/1 wp 6357.07.sxw [P.A.]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 6357 Of 2007.

MANDAKINI RAMESH RAJE.

VERSUS

THE STATE Of MAH AND ORS.

Appearance => Mr. Amit Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D.R. Kale, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Maharashtra.

Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for Respondent No.2 - Returning Officer. Mr. D.G. Nagode, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

CORAM

:

V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATE :

12th MARCH, 2015.

Per Court :- Heard Mr. Amit Deshpande, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. D.R. Kale, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, Mr. S.T. Shelke, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 - Returning Officer and Mr. D.G. Nagode, learned counsel for Respondent No.3. [2] The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, by efflux of time, present Writ Petition has rendered infructuous. Submission is accepted. Present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Rule is discharged.

(V.M. DESHPANDE, J.)