Nitin Prakash Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1035,37, 38-WP-9314-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 9314 OF 2021 NILESH MOHAN CHAUDHARI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sambhaji S. Tope AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Vaibhav Deshmukh ...

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 9358 OF 2021 NITIN PRAKASH CHAVAN

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sambhaji S. Tope AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for respondent No. 2 : Mr. B.U. Bondar Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Vaibhav Deshmukh ...

AND WRIT PETITION NO. 9363 OF 2021 NIVEDITA MURLIDHAR BHOSLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AD OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sambhaji S. Tope AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Vaibhav Deshmukh ...

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 01st DECEMBER, 2021 PER COURT :- Mr. Karlekar, learned AGP, on instructions, submits that after filing of the writ petitions, approval has been granted and appointments of the petitioners have been restored.

1035,37, 38-WP-9314-21.odt 2.

In view of the said statement, the grievance of the petitioners does not subsist and writ petitions are disposed of. ( R. N. LADDHA ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE mtk