← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPLN/2049/2020disposed off

Raju Rabhaji Shende v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2021-01-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. U. Debadwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.532 OF 2020 WITH APPLN/2026/2020 IN APEAL/588/2020 WITH APPLN/2049/2020 IN APEAL/532/2020 WITH APEAL/588/2020 WITH APPLN/2303/2020 IN APEAL/588/2020 CHANDRAKANT S/O ANANDA BARFE AND ANOTHER .. Appellants

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .. Respondent ...

Advocate for Appellants : Mr Sunil G Magre (in Criminal Appeal No.532 of 2019) Advocate for Applicants : Mr H.U. Dhage (In Criminal Application Nos.2049 of 2020 & 2303 of 2020) APP for the Respondent / State : Mr R.V. Dasalkar ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND B. U. DEBADWAR, JJ.

Date : 27-01-2021 PER COURT :- (CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.532 OF 2020 & 588 OF 2020) 1.

These two criminal appeals have been preferred by the convicted accused seeking to challenge the Judgment and order dated 13-08-2020, delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Session Case No.61 of 2019 vide which, the appellants - accused have been convicted for having committed offences punishable under Sections 325 r/w Sec. 34 of the IPC and have been sentenced for 3 years rigorous imprisonment. They have also been sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life along with fine Gajanan

amounts for having committed the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w. Sec.34 of the IPC.

2.

Having heard the learned Advocate for the appellants and the learned Prosecutor, the appeals are Admitted. The learned Prosecutor waives service on admission.

3.

The learned Trial Court is requested to prepare the appeal paper book in Session Case No.61 of 2019, as expeditiously as possible and preferably by 31-07-2021 and transmit the said appeal paper book along with the original Record & Proceedings to this Court, by 31-08-2021.

(IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NOS.2049 OF 2020 & 2303 OF 2020) 4.

The learned Advocate appearing for the applicants in these two criminal applications submits that, he desires to assist the Prosecutor. The learned Advocates appearing for the accused and the State, do not oppose the applications. As such, the two criminal applications are allowed.

(B. U. DEBADWAR) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE Gajanan