← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8755/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Meena Babruwan Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2018-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal3 pages

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8755 OF 2018 Meena Babruwan Jadhav ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..

Respondents Shri. V. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri. A. V. Deshmukh, A.G.P. for Respondent/State. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 1 st August, 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT : (PER S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) 1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and the petition is heard for final disposal by the consent of learned counsel for the respective parties. 3.

The petitioner is requesting for issuance of direction to the

( 2 ) respondents for stepping up their pay so as to bring it at par with the junior Associate Professor w.e.f. the date of revision of pay/salary as per Government Resolution dated 12.08.2009.

4.

The facts giving rise to the instant petition need not be stated in detail since those are undisputed. Even otherwise, the facts are identical as in the case of Dr. Sudhakar Murlidhar Lawande and others Vs. State of Maharashtra (WP No.11129/2015) and in the case of Sudamrao Keshavrao Aher & ors. Vs. The state of Maharashtra & st November, 2013 others in W.P. No.10283/2012, decided on 21 [2014(1) ALL MR 697].

5.

For the reasons recorded while disposing of the aforesaid matter presented by Sudamrao Aher and others, the instant writ petition also deserve to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. 6.

The respondents shall take necessary action to step up the pay of the petitioner so as to bring it at par with juniors where all the parameters are same and shall not discriminate only because the junior teachers have acquired Ph.D. Degree and are getting higher salary during

( 3 ) implementation of 6th Pay Commission's recommendations. The salary of the petitioner may be refixed and arrears be paid within a period of six months.

7. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

8. There shall be no order as to costs.

[ SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] ass/wp 8755.18