Sau. Aarti Prasad Deshmukh v. Prasad Abasaheb Deshmukh

1 MCA 124-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2017 Aarti W/o Prasad Deshmukh ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

Prasad S/o Abasaheb Deshmukh ...RESPONDENT Mr. Rahul D. Khadap, Advocate for petitioner Mr P.V. Tapse, Advocate for respondent sole CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE :19th September, 2017 ORAL ORDER :

The learned Counsel for respondent opposed request for transfer on the ground that the proceedings initiated by the applicant are subsequent to the one initiated by the respondent. 2.

Given an option as to whether respondent is ready and willing to bear the conveyance charges and other expenses for making applicant to attend the proceedings at Nashik, there is no response from the respondent.

2 MCA 124-2017 3.

Considering the distance between Ambajogai and Nashik, which is about 350 Kms. and the fact that applicant is residing with her parents at Ambejoai, looking to the hardship and convenience, it will be appropriate, in my opinion, to allow the application in terms of Prayer Clause "C".

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) pjm