Xyz v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

947-acb-152-2022.odt (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO.152 OF 2022 XYZ

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shejwal Arun S APP for Respondent/State : Mr. K.S. Patil Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. V.L. Bhange h/f Mr. Kiran D Jadhav ...

CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 07, 2023 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2.

Perused the order granting bail. The learned Judge granting bail has considered the facts and specifically observed about the conduct of the applicant/victim. The material which was placed before the Court was duly considered. The order granting bail does not appear arbitrary or perverse. There are no overwhelming circumstances to cancel the bail granted to non-applicant no.2. 3.

For the above reasons, the application stands dismissed. (S.G. MEHARE, J.) Mujaheed//