Narayan Shankar Mistry v. Rakhamabai Chaitram Patil And ORS

*1* 16.ca.829.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 829 OF 2014 IN RAST/22274/2013 IN WP/1890/2013 NARAYAN SHANKAR MISTRY

VERSUS

RAKHAMABAI CHAITRAM PATIL AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Shri Kulkarni Mukul S. AGP for Respondents 5 to 8 : Shri V.G.Shelke. Advocate for Respondents 1 to 4 : Ms.Vaishali Deshpande h/f P.B.Patil. ...

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE :- 08th January, 2016 Per Court:

The Applicant prays for condonation of 78 days delay caused in filing the Review Application seeking review of the order of this Court dated 22.04.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.1890/2013. Shri Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that the learned Judge who passed the order under view has since retired. The learned Advocates for the Non-Applicants oppose the application for condonation of delay. Alternatively, it is submitted that the costs may be imposed and the same be donated to the Advocate

*2* 16.ca.829.14 Association's Bar Library, High Court, Aurangabad. I have heard the learned Advocates and considered the averments set out in the application.

The Civil Application is, therefore, allowed. Delay of 78 days is condoned subject to the Applicant depositing costs of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with the Advocate Association's Bar Library, High Court, Aurangabad within a period of TWO WEEKS from today. After the costs are deposited, the Review Application be registered and be listed for hearing on 02.02.2016. If the costs are not deposited, this order shall stand recalled and this Civil Application shall then stand rejected. kps (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)