← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6764/2011disposed offdismissed for default

Pravinkumar Jinabhai Patel v. Kalpita Builders Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Director

2015-09-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav2 pages

wp6764.11 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6764 OF 2011 PRAVINKUMAR JINABHAI PATEL

VERSUS

KALPITA BUILDERS PVT. LTD. THR. DIRECTOR ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Bajaj Anil S.

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. B. Yawalkar .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2015 P.C. :- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition, the suit is finally decided and dismissed by the trial court. Being aggrieved by the same, original plaintiff has preferred appeal which is still pending. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to raise the ground as if the petitioner/original defendant preferred separate appeal in view of the provisions of Order 41 Rule 22 of C.P.C.. However, such liberty is not required while disposing of present writ petition, because the course as provided in Order 41 Rule 22 of C.P.C. is always open to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/

wp6764.11 -2-