Rehana Magdum Shaikh And ORS v. Mohamad Ibrar Alimohmad Abbaskhan Qureshi And ORS

10635.19CA.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10635 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.21136 OF 2019 REHANA MAGDUM SHAIKH & OTHERS

VERSUS

MOHAMAD IBRAR ALIMOHMAD ABBASKHAN QURESHI & OTHERS ...

Mr.S.P.Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr.Fayaz Patel, Advocate for the respondent nos.1 and 2.

Mr.Rohit H. Dahat & Mr.S.S.Patil, Advocates for the respondent no.3.

...

CORAM : V.L.ACHLIYA,J.

DATE : 21.01.2020 P.C.

1] The applicants have moved this application seeking condonation of 24 days delay in filing appeal for the reasons set out in detail in the application.

2] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the respondent nos.1 to 3.

3] On due consideration of the submissions advanced in the light of unchallenged and uncontroverted pleadings

10635.19CA.odt made in the application assigning cause for condonation of delay, I am of the view that delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B. Delay condoned.

4] Appeal be registered subject to removal of office objection.

5] Civil Application is disposed of in above terms.

[V.L.ACHLIYA] JUDGE DDC