← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/170/2007dismissedrule discharged

Dnyanoba Tatyaba Kadam v. The State Of Mah And ORS

2017-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil1 pages

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 170 OF 2007 DNYANOBA TATYABA KADAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAH & ORS ...

AGP for Respondents 1 to 3: Mrs.A.V.Gondhalekar ...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL,JJ.

DATE : 31/08/2017 PER COURT :- On 9 June 2017, when the matter was called out, the counsel for petitioner was absent. The Court observed that if nobody turns up for the petitioner on the next date, matter will be dismissed. Thereafter, the matter was called out on 14 August 2017. On that date also none appeared for the petitioner, still the matter was adjourned for dismissal.

2] Today also when the matter is called out, none appears for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition.

3] The Writ Petition, as such is dismissed for non prosecution. Rule discharged. No costs.

(MANGESH S. PATIL,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) umg/