← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/254/2019compramised

Dinkar Manikrao Kadam And Another v. Sagarrao Ganpatrao Kadam Lrs Vijay And Others

2022-07-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat2 pages

sa.254.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO.254 OF 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.11127 OF 2018 Dinkar s/o. Manikrao Kadam and anr.

..Appellants Vs.

Sagarrao s/o. Ganpatrao Kadam since deceased, through L.Rs.

Vijay s/o. Sagarrao Kadam and ors.

..Respondents ---- Mr.S.S.Tope, Advocate for appellants Mr.Kuldeep S. Patil, Advocate h/f. Mr.S.S.Choudhary, Advocate for appellants Mr.V.V.Pawar, Advocate for respondent nos.2A, 2B, 4, 5A to 5E ---- CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT, J.

DATE : JULY 15, 2022 ORDER :- This Second Appeal is said to have been compromised between the parties thereto. A memo of compromise duly verified before the Section Officer of this Court has been placed on record. All the parties thereto are present before this Court along with their respective Advocates. The terms of compromise are neither illegal nor void. The appellants do not wish to proceed with the appeal. The parties have agreed to act upon the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Suit No.111 of 2007 dated 09.09.2010.

sa.254.2019 2.

In the circumstances, the Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise.

3.

In view of the above, Civil Application No.11127 of 2018 for grant of stay does not survive and stands disposed of. [R.G. AVACHAT, J.] KBP