← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8434/2023disposed off

Sneha Suryakant Bondle Through Power Of Attorney Holder Suryakant Jalba Bondle v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2023-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

56.WP-8434-2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8434 OF 2023 Sneha d/o Suryakant Bondle

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept., Mantralaya, Mumbai.

2. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee Kinwat, at Aurangabad, Through its Dy. Director (R).

Dist. Aurangabad.

...Respondents

...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. G.K. Chinchole h/f Mr. Sunil M. Vibhute AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S. G. Sangale ...

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 17 JULY 2023.

PER COURT :

Heard both the sides.

1.

The petitioner'

s proposal awaiting validation of her tribe claim is pending adjudication with the respondent no.2/Committee. 2.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner on instructions submits that the proposal of petitioner's father is being considered by the

56.WP-8434-2023.doc Scrutiny Committee and a report of the vigilance has been received. The petitioner'

s father has also filed reply to that report and the matter is closed for passing order on 12.07.2023. He submits that the petitioner being the daughter is adopting the say filed by the father. 3.

In view of such statement, the learned AGP on instructions submits that the Committee would decide the petitioner and his father's proposal within two weeks.

4.

We dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent no.2/Committee to decide the petitioner's proposal within two weeks from today.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] Najeeb...