Laxman Vithoba Surkute v. The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Latur Thr Regional Manager And ANR

ca2086-17 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2086 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.22180 OF 2016 Laxman Vithoba Surkute APPLICANT

VERSUS

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Ltd., Latur and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A. N. Irpatgire, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S. P. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent - State .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 21 st FEBRUARY, 2018 ORDER :

1.

Heard learned advocates for the parties.

2.

The respondents do not appear to be in a position to challenge veracity of the contents of the application explaining the circumstances causing delay in filing appeal. 3.

In the circumstances, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B" and is disposed of.

4.

Learned advocate for the applicant further fairly states that the applicant / appellant would not claim interest for the period of delay if the amount of compensation is enhanced. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca2086-17