Bhimrao Hari Khalane And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

cwp959.15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.959 OF 2015

1) Bhimrao Hari Khalane,

2) Dnyaneshwar Mansaram Mali,

3) Chetana Sudhakar Mali,

4) Sharada Jankiram Patil,

5) Yogesh Eknath Khalane,

6) Prashant Hari Khalane ...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

1) The State of Maharashtra,

2) Rameshchandra Arjune Pachpol ...RESPONDENTS ...

Mr.P.P. Chavan Advocate for Petitioners.

Mr.M.M. Nerlikar, A.P.P. for Resp. No.1.

...

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 13TH OCTOBER 2016 ORDER :

.

Heard. Perused the allegations in the

cwp959.15 F.I.R. Prima facie offence is disclosed, which needs to be investigated. No case is made out for quashing the F.I.R.

2.

In that view of the matter, the Criminal Writ Petition stands rejected.

[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.] asb/OCT16