Pratiksha Govind Giri v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1418.21CA+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1418 OF 2021 IN RAST/20901/2020 WITH CA/1362/2021 IN RAST/20900/2020 PRATIKSHA GOVIND GIRI

VERSUS

VIDYAAMRUT SHIKSHAN PARASARAK MANDAL AND OTHERS ...

Ms.P.S. Talekar for Talekar and Associates, advocate for the applicants.

Mr.V.D. Gunale, advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2. Mr.Ameya Sabnis, advocate for respondent nos.3 and 4. Mr.P.S. Patil, Addl. G.P. for respondent/State. ...

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & S.G.DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 08.04.2022 P.C. :

1.

Heard.

2.

Considering the submissions and for the reasons set out, the applications are allowed. Delay of 207 and 496 days respectively, is condoned.

3.

Since all the parties appeared in the review applications, by consent, stand over to 22nd April, 2022, in the `urgent orders' category.

(S.G.DIGE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) SGA