Ranjitsing Lalsing Bawari v. The State Of Maharshtra

(1) Cri. Appln. No. 4087 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Application No. 4087 of 2016 District : Latur Ranjitsing Lalsing Bawari, Age : 55 years, Occupation : Labour, R/o. Maula Ali Nagar, Ahmedpur, Taluka : Ahmedpur, District : Latur.

.. Applicant.

versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Police Station, Ahmedpur, District : Latur.

.. Respondent.

............

Mr. Sudarshan J. Salunke, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. A.S. Shinde, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for the respondent.

............

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J.

DATE : 7TH SEPTEMBER 2016 ORAL ORDER:

The applicant / accused in Crime No.

164/2014, for offences punishable under Sections 307,

(2) Cri. Appln. No. 4087 of 2016 323, 504, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered with Police Station, Ahmedpur, District Latur, by this application, is seeking his release on bail.

2.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3.

Perused the charge-sheet. The crime in question is registered on the basis of report lodged by Rajaram s/o. Manik Babar. In the FIR, he averred that one Karansing Babari assaulted him by means of stick and another co-accused assaulted him by means of Katti. It is further alleged that he was also assaulted by means of stick by other co-accused. In supplementary statement, informant corrected the name of Karansing Babari as that of Ranjitsing Bawari i.e. present applicant.

4.

Perusal of injury certificate shows that injured Rajaram Babar had suffered only one contused lacerated wound on frontal region.

5.

Perusal of judgment in Sessions Case No. 12/2015 goes to show that co-accused are already acquitted in this case.

6.

There is nothing on record to show that the

(3) Cri. Appln. No. 4087 of 2016 applicant was avoiding arrest though his sons were facing trial.

7.

In this view of the matter, there are no reasons to refuse bail to the present applicant. 8.

Hence, I pass the following order :- (a) The Application is allowed.

(b) The applicant / accused, in the above crime, be released on bail on his executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- and on furnishing one or more solvent sureties of the like amount.

(c) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any persons acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts either to the Court or to any police officer.

(d) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence in any manner and shall cooperate the learned trial Judge in expeditious disposal of the trial against him.

(e) The applicant shall not repeat commission of similar type of offences in future.

(4) Cri. Appln. No. 4087 of 2016 9.

The Application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

( A.M. BADAR ) JUDGE ..........

puranik / CRIAPPLN4087.16