Valmik Maroti Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 WRIT PETITION NO.9538 OF 2021 VALMIK MAROTI SHINDE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. Kalyankar Vaishali R. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. G. Karlekar. Adv. for Respondent No.2 : Mr. V. C. Patil h/f Mr. U. B. Bondar. Adv. for Res. No.4 : Mr. G. K. Chinchole h/f Mr. V. M. Vibhute. ...

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.

DATE : 11.02.2022 P. C. :- 1.

In furtherance of Order dated 05.01.2022 the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad Division has submitted its report in a sealed envelop through the Registrar of this Court. The said envelop is opened in Court. The report dated 17.01.2022 duly signed by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad is taken on record.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner in the concluding paragraph of its report has stated that, the principle amount of Rs.75,387/- and interest amount of Rs.1,07,219/-(total

amount of Rs.1,82,606/-) is transferred to the GPF amount of Mr. Valmik Maroti Shinde and now he can withdraw the said amount as per the Maharashtra General Provident Fund Rules, 1998. It is further stated that, the petitioner's grievances are complied with before 05.01.2022, i.e. the date of order of this Court. It seemed to the concerned Authority that, the problem has been precipitated due to wrongly placed communication by Zilla Parishad, Parbhani to Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad instead of Zilla Parishad, Osmanabad and subsequently wrong acceptance of the amount by Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The Divisional Commissioner has gracefully accepted the said inadvertent and unintentional mistake on behalf of his subordinates and has expressed his regrets for the delay caused in this issue. The report dated 17.01.2022 is accepted. 3.

In view of the categorical statements made by the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, the grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is met out. The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions fairly submitted that, grievance of the petitioner herein as of today does not survive.

Petition is accordingly disposed off.

(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) ...

vmk/-