Premla Lingoji Gajulwad v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(1) WRIT PETITION NO.8114 OF 2016 Sau. Premla Lingoji Gajulwad Mr.R.R.Mantri, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.3,
(2) WRIT PETITION NO.7566 OF 2016 Chandrashekhar s/o Dattatraya Jadhav Mr.S.B.Sontakke, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1.
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2,
(3) WRIT PETITION NO.7359 OF 2016 Anita d/o Ramchandra Jadhav Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No.3 & 4.
{2} (4)WRIT PETITION NO.7356 OF 2016 Jyotsana d/o Kishan Waghmare Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No. 2 & 3
(5) WRIT PETITION NO.6970 OF 2016 Ekbal d/o Umdusaheb Shaikh Mr.S.P.Kausalye, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2.
(6) WRIT PETITION NO.6967 OF 2016 Surekha d/o Bapurao Mutte Mr.S.P.Kausalye, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2,
(7) WRIT PETITION NO.6502 OF 2016
{3} Ramesh s/o Kishanrao Mendke Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1..
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2 & 3,
(8) WRIT PETITION NO.6415 OF 2016 Meenakshi d/o Mohanrao Bondle Mr.V.A.Dhakne, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2
(9) WRIT PETITION NO.6211 OF 2016 Uttam s/o Vivshwanath Devkate Mr.S.P.Kausalye, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sujeet Karlekar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondent No.2
(10) WRIT PETITION NO.6090 OF 2016 Sanjay Motiram Sawale
{4} Mr.A.A.Nimbalkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, advocate for Respondents No.2 to 4. CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 31st August, 2016 PER COURT:
Learned Counsel appearing for Zilla Parishad, on instructions, states that the grievance raised by respective petitioners in aforesaid writ petitions has been accepted by the learned Divisional Commissioner and as such, the transfer orders are modified accordingly.
In this view of the matter, petitions need not be considered on merit. Writ Petitions are disposed of. If, at all, any grievance survives, it would be open for the concerned petitioner to avail of the remedies available in law.
K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/wp811416