Vaishali Vilasrao Nikam v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13068 OF 2022 VAISHALI VILASRAO NIKAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Pawar Rahul S.

AGP for Respondents State: Mrs M A Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. Y. B. Bolkar Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. R. B. Ade

CORAM

: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE : 10TH NOVEMBER, 2022 ORDER:

1.

Heard. Learned Advocate representing the respondents have strongly objected grant of the civil application. 2.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner has taken reason for himself as the matter was under objection and he could not notice that this matter is also located under the common order which was a conditional order for removing office objections. Under such circumstance, the petitioner should not be blamed for the inadvertence of the Advocate. Hence the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed.

3.

Writ petition stands restored on condition that whatever the objections are still remaining should removed within a period of two weeks.

(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) JPChavan Page 1 of 1