Rukhmanbai Sitaram More And ANR v. Nasar Khan Munshi Khan And ORS

( 1 ) 22-FA-3757-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8944 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 3757 OF 2016 Rukhmanbai Sitaram More And Anr

VERSUS

Nasar Khan Munshi Khan And Ors.

...

Mr. Anand Dale h/f Mr. Swapnil S. Rathi, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER 2025.

PC :- 1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

At the outset, the learned Advocate seeks leave to correct the word in paragraph No.6, in the last line, by substituting the word "Mathura District" for the word "Mewat District (Haryana State)". 3.

Civil Application No.8944/2025 is filed for seeking substituted service of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Ethape

( 2 ) 22-FA-3757-2016 4.

For the reasons stated in the application, application stands allowed.

5.

Notice to respondent No. 1 be published in the newspaper "Business Standard" widely circulated in Mathura District (Uttar Pradesh).

6.

Notice to respondent No.2 be published in the newspaper "Dainik Haribhumi" widely circulated in the in Mewat District (Haryana State). 7.

Notice returnable on 19th November 2025.

8.

Notices be published at least two weeks prior to the returnable date.

9.

Civil application stands disposed off.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] Ethape