← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/210/2016disposed offdismissed for default

Smt. Sangeeta Mahadev Bhor And Another v. Maharashtra State Transport Corporation Notice Administrator, Ahmednagar

2017-06-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre3 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2016 Shri. Dilip Laxman Phalle ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.170 OF 2016 Ms. Arti Mahadev Bhor ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2016 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.220 OF 2016 Smt. Sulochana Shantaram Pingle ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.182 OF 2016 Smt. Sunita Dilip Phalle ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.207 OF 2016 Smt. Sulochana Shantaram Pingle & anr.

..APPLICANTS

(2)

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.210 OF 2016 Smt. Sangeeta Mahadev Bhor & anr.

..APPLICANTS

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.221 OF 2016 Smt. Sangeeta Mahadev Bhor ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation ..RESPONDENT CORAM : N. W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 7th June, 2017 ORAL ORDER All these matters were called twice on 5th June, 2017. Since none had appeared on behalf of the applicants, the matters were posted on 6 th June, 2017.

2.

Even on 6th June, 2017, on second call, neither the learned Counsel for the applicants nor the applicants remained present. Upon request of the Advocate for applicants, Advocate Ms Maya Jamdhade informed the learned Counsel about listing of the matters, as is informed by the said

(3) Advocate. Learned Advocate Ms Chetana Rathod had assured that she would make appropriate arrangement for appearance in the matters. 3.

Today also none appears on behalf of the applicants. The matters are listed for dismissal.

4.

In view of the conduct of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and the applicants, as recorded above, Misc. Civil Applications stand dismissed for want of prosecution. (N. W. SAMBRE, J.) amj