← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8747/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Shaikh Naser Abdul Kadar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-07-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

1 wp 8747.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8747 OF 2019 SHAIKH NASER ABDUL KADAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Shaikh Mohammad Naseer A AGP for Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. P. G. Borade Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. N. E. Deshmukh ...

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE:

th JULY, 2019 PER COURT:

1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an objection to the voters list. The said objection be directed to be decided before preparing the final voters list.

2.

The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondents no. 1 and 2. Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel waives service of notice for respondent no. 3.

2 wp 8747.19 3.

Naturally, if the objections are raised to the provisional voters list within the time stipulated then the authority is required to decide the said objections before the publication of the final voters list. The petitioner's apprehension does not appear to be based on actual facts.

4.

The writ petitions is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe