Shaikh Saniya Anam Waheed Tadvi v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 WRIT PETITION NO. 8851 OF 2017 WITH WP/8852/2017 WITH WP/8853/2017 WITH WP/8854/2017 WITH WP/8855/2017 WITH WP/8856/2017 WITH WP/8857/2017 WITH WP/8858/2017 WITH WP/8859/2017 WITH WP/8860/2017 WITH WP/8861/2017 WITH WP/8862/2017 WITH WP/8863/2017 WITH WP/8864/2017 WITH WP/8865/2017 VINITKUMAR MOTIRAM TOTLOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vibhute Sunil M. AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.S. Patil ...
with 917 WRIT PETITION NO. 8868 OF 2017 KIRAN LALUPRASAD YAMBADWAR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Bilolikar Upendra B. AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.R. Kale ...
with WRIT PETITION NO. 8883 OF 2017 SHAIKH SANIYA ANAM WAHEED TADVI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS with WRIT PETITION NO. 8884 OF 2017 ADNAN TADVEE ABDUL KAYUM
( 2 )
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vibhute Sunil M. AGP for Respondents: Mr. D.R. Kale ...
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE :
12.07.2017.
P.C. :- .
After these petitions were directed to be listed today and on account of the urgency, so also not to cause any disruption in the education of meritorious students, the learned A.G.P. on behalf of the state and the second respondent, has made a statement that all students like the petitioners' and seeking admission against reserved seats should give an undertaking in the prescribed form to the second respondent, stating that they would on receipt of the certificate of validity from the competent Scrutiny Committee duly forward it to the authorities, so as to regularize their admission if obtained on merit. 2.
In the event, the certificate of validity is refused then all consequences in law shall follow and for which the authorities will not be held responsible. It is agreed that such an undertaking would be furnished by all the petitioners' and on furnishing of the same, the petitioners be allowed to participate in the ongoing admission process
( 3 ) and if admitted their admission would be in terms of the undertaking. Each of these writ petitions are disposed of on the basis of the statement made on instructions by the learned A.G.P. The order is passed in the presence of Dr. Arunkumar Vyas, O.S.D., Directorate of Medical Education and Research, CET Cell.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] mub