Sopan Rajaram Kalamkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2025:BHC-AUG:26715 953.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

953 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1351 OF 2025 SOPAN RAJARAM KALAMKAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Prashant Prabhakar Giri. APP for Respondent / State : Mr. K. K. Naik.

Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Ms. Sarita Gaikwad. ...

CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

26th September, 2025.

P.C.:

After hearing the learned Advocates for the both the sides, when this Court expressed disinclination to grant relief to the applicant, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application.

Leave granted. The bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

The learned counsel for the applicant further prayed that the trial may be expedited.

The learned Trial Court is directed to decide the case as expeditiously as possible, in any case within one year. However, it is clarified that if any matter is expedited either by the Honourable

953.odt Supreme Court or this Court, then the Trial Court shall conclude that case first and then proceed further with this trial. Needless to mention that it is a sessions trial and word "sessions" means once it is started it shall not be stopped till it is concluded.

The fees of Ms. Sarita Gaikwad, learned counsel appointed to represent the cause of respondent Nos.2 to 4 be paid through the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad as per Rules and schedule.

[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga