Avinash Pandit Chavan v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 10-WP8809-19+.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 WRIT PETITION NO. 8809 OF 2019 Avinash Pandit Chavan .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Smt. A. R. Rathod, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. P. G. Borade, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A. B. Kharosekar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 & 5. WITH 41 WRIT PETITION NO. 8888 OF 2019 Kavita Prabhat Chavan .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Smt. A. R. Rathod, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. P. G. Borade, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A. B. Kharosekar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4 & 5. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ DATED : 22nd JULY, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the proposals seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioners are pending with respondent No. 2. The same is not yet decided. 2.

Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Counsel for respondents and learned AGP.

2 10-WP8809-19+.doc 3.

In case, the proposals seeking approval to the appointment of the petitioners are pending with respondent No. 2, then respondent No. 2 shall take decision upon it on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months from today. 4.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

( MANGESH S. PATIL ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.