Vikas Shivdas Patil v. Sau. Gitanjali Vikas Patil

ca13912-16 drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13912 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.22630 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.13914 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.22633 OF 2016 Vikas Shivdas Patil APPLICANT

VERSUS

Gitanjali Vikas Patil RESPONDENT .......

Mr. Deepak D. Chaudhari, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.A.Ambilwade h/f Mr. A. S. Sawant, Advocate for respondent .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 20 th JANUARY, 2017 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for the applicant refers to the contentions referred to in the civil application and contends that the delay is neither intentional nor deliberate. 2.

Learned advocate for the respondent purports to oppose the contentions, yet is not in a position to challenge veracity and correctness of the reasons given in the civil application. 3.

As such, civil applications stand allowed in terms of prayer clause "A" and are disposed of.

[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/ca13912-16