Mahesh Balu Dhore v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 Sr25WP9582.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 9582 OF 2017 Mahesh S/o. Balu Dhore ... Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ..........

Mr U. R. Awate, Advocate h/f Mr S. K. Mathpati, Advocate for the petitioner Mr A. V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondents No. 1 and 2 Ms Usha Kale, Advocate for respondent No. 3 .............

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 19TH APRIL, 2018.

ORDER:

1.

We have heard Shri. U. R. Awate, learned Counsel h/f Shri. Mathpati, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.

The learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that, the petitioner has submitted a fresh proposal. The respondent No. 3 would consider the said proposal and the decision thereon will be informed to the petitioner within a period of four months.

2 Sr25WP9582.2017 3.

The statement made by learned counsel for respondent No. 3 is accepted.

4.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE Punde