Pankaj Shivaji Shinde v. Swati Pankaj Shinde

1 919CA8241.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8241 OF 2024 IN FCAST/20167/2024 Pankaj Shivaji Shinde VERSUS Swati Pankaj Shinde ...

Ms Pratiksha C. Kale - Advocate for Applicant appears through VC Ms Akshara Madke - Advocate (appointed) for Respondent (absent) ...

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

DATED : 14TH FEBRUARY, 2025 PER COURT : - 1.

Learned Advocate for the Applicant appears through Video Conferencing. None appears for the sole Respondent, though served.

2.

The previous Roznama shows that Mr. R. R. Kale has caused appearance for the Respondent.

3.

This is an Application for condonation of 196 days delay caused in preferring the Family Court Appeal against the Judgment and decree passed by the learned Family Court, Ahmednagar. 4.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed in terms of prayer clause '

B'.

5.

Application stands disposed of.

[NEERAJ P. DHOTE] [R. G. AVACHAT] JUDGE JUDGE Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/02/2025 10:17:43 SG Punde