Purushottam Narayan Mandlik v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

.. 1 ..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 Writ Petition No.9960 Of 2021 Purushottam Narayan Mandlik .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and Another .. Respondents ...

Mr Avinash S. Khedkar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr S.P. Tiwari, AGP for Respondent No.1 Mr Avinash Aghav, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R.N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 07-09-2021 PER COURT : - 1.

Mr Khedkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking transfer on the ground of couple convenience. The application to that effect is given to the Chief Executive Officer on 23-08-2021.

2.

The learned AGP accepts notice for Respondent No.1 and Mr Aghav, learned Counsel appears for Respondent No.2. 3.

Mr Aghav, learned Counsel submits that respondent no.2 would decide the application of the petitioner (page - 33) within eight Gajanan

.. 2 ..

weeks.

4.

In view of the said statement, Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE ...

Gajanan